New York Times: In Search for a Building Commissioner, a Debate Over Qualifications
In the wake of building deaths, the need to hire a new commissioner has given rise to a healthy debate over the qualifications for the Building Commissioner for New York City. The New York Times reports:
As the city struggles to keep pace with a building boom, enforce safety laws and curb fatal construction accidents, architects and engineers are fighting Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg’s effort to downgrade the qualification requirements for the city’s buildings commissioner.
The mayor, with the support of the City Council speaker, Christine C. Quinn, seeks to deepen the pool and managerial talent of candidates for the job, which has been vacant since Patricia J. Lancaster, an architect, resigned under fire last month.
To do that, Mr. Bloomberg hopes to drop the requirement in the City Charter that only a registered architect or licensed engineer can hold the post.
But the professional societies of architects and engineers, as well as the New York Building Congress, say that only a technical expert is capable of running a department with the seemingly conflicting tasks of promoting real estate development and overseeing public safety, while enforcing the city’s vast building code and complex zoning regulations.
“I’m tremendously concerned about construction site safety,” said John F. Hennessy III, chairman of the American Council of Engineering Companies, “but I’m also concerned about the long-term safety of buildings. Materials, products and building systems approved today have to last for the next 40 years.”
This seems like a good debate to be having as hiring a new Building commissioner becomes important on Michael Bloomberg’s agenda. Its certainly a difficult job which requires a delicate balancing act.
